Bleeds Nexopia


Age 22, Male
Posts: 14,903
Before making threads about questions please read through this thread.
If you have anything you want answered or think I have missed message me and I will add it.


Is JK writing an 8th Harry Potter book?
No, but she is writing an encyclopedia. It is going to try and tie loose ends together and add excess information that never found a place in the book.

How did Harry not die when Voldemort casted the killing curse on him in the Forbidden Forest?
Most people argue he did die. But it was really only the piece of Voldemort in him that died. Since Lily died for Harry she gave him the most protection that anyone could ever have against someone, the power of love (his secret weapon). Harry was vulnerable once he was saved the first time in Godric's Hallow. After that Harry could be killed by Voldemort, but since Voldemort took some of Harry's blood and put it into his own veins in Riddle's graveyard, the protection remained in tact. At this point Harry could not be killed Voldemort. So when Harry was hit by the killing curse the part of Voldemort was attacked and not Harry himself, he was just knocked out by the huge impact of part of his soul leaving.
JK said that being the master of the hallows didn't have significance to actually controlling whether or not one dies or not only let's one truly understand death. This is what saved Harry. Once Harry understands death, was the master of death, he knew there were worse things than dying. Harry would have had to have been "killed" in order for Voldemort to have died. Since Harry didn't fear death he allowed himself to be killed which killed the piece of Voldemort's soul.
What was the baby-like creature at Kings Cross?
The part of Voldemort's soul that was in Harry's body.

Can Harry still speak parseltongue?
No. It was the part of Voldemort's soul that was in him that could speak parseltongue.

Does Harry become an auror?
Yes. Ron and Harry both become the leaders of the auror office.
How does Harry cast auto aim magic he didn't know he could do in book seven?
JK is yet to give an explanation on. Many people believe it was the wand that reacted funny (sort of like Priori Incantanem) but I dont think so because Voldemort had Lucius' wand. I think it has something to do with Harry's blood in Voldemort that protected him.

How does Harry kill Voldemort if he wasn't holding the Elder Wand?
Harry was the master of the Elder Wand. NOT THE MASTER OF DEATH, Harry didn't need all three hallows because he already mastered death and understood death happens to all that pass through the mortal world.

How did Harry come to be the master of the Elder Wand?
In order to become a master of the Elder Wand one must defeat the previous master. Draco defeated Dumbledore by disarming him. Since Draco defeated Dumbledore he was the master of the Elder Wand. SNAPE WAS NOT THE MASTER BECAUSE HE MURDERED DUMBLEDORE ON DUMBLEDORE'S ORDERS. Even though Voldemort had possession of the Elder Wand and thought that Snape was the owner he was wrong. When Harry stole Draco's wand he defeated him, this made Harry the rightful master of the Elder Wand.

Does Polyjuice Potion mimic voice's as well?
Yes. The misconception can be blamed on Warner Bros. in Chamber of Secrets movie.

Is Dumbledore gay?
Yes, he was homosexual.
Dumbledore was smitten with rival Gellert Grindelwald, whom he defeated long ago in a battle between good and bad wizards. Falling in love can blind us to an extent. Dumbeldore felt horribly, terribly let down.
JK Rowling, herself. 

[edited on October 20, 2007 at 8:39 pm]
incognitus
deleted account
i got one for you...
Why does the Polyjuice Potion now mimic voices exactly, when in the Chamber of Secrets, it didn't?
(i may be wrong on this) 
merrylou
deleted account
Originally posted by: incognitus
i got one for you...
Why does the Polyjuice Potion now mimic voices exactly, when in the Chamber of Secrets, it didn't?
(i may be wrong on this)

I don't think it does.
If you're referring to in Deathly Hallows when Hermione polyjuices Malfalda..I think she was imitating her voive. I don't have the book handy, but I think it implyed she was imitating. But you're right, it doesnt say anythign about Harry or Ron changing their voices... 
incognitus
deleted account
Originally posted by: merrylou
Originally posted by: incognitus
i got one for you...
Why does the Polyjuice Potion now mimic voices exactly, when in the Chamber of Secrets, it didn't?
(i may be wrong on this)

I don't think it does.
If you're referring to in Deathly Hallows when Hermione polyjuices Malfalda..I think she was imitating her voive. I don't have the book handy, but I think it implyed she was imitating. But you're right, it doesnt say anythign about Harry or Ron changing their voices...

Ron's voice changes to perfectly match the man, not sure about Hermoine's.
In the CoS, Ron and Harry both had to imitate Crabbe and Goyle. 
Bleeds Nexopia


Age 24, Male
Posts: 20,420
JK got lazy, she's like that 
poison.shade
deleted account
Originally posted by: merrylou
Originally posted by: incognitus
i got one for you...
Why does the Polyjuice Potion now mimic voices exactly, when in the Chamber of Secrets, it didn't?
(i may be wrong on this)

I don't think it does.
If you're referring to in Deathly Hallows when Hermione polyjuices Malfalda..I think she was imitating her voive. I don't have the book handy, but I think it implyed she was imitating. But you're right, it doesnt say anythign about Harry or Ron changing their voices...

it only didn't mimic in the movies which are good, but not written by Jo. it never said in the book if the voices were mimicked or not 
incognitus
deleted account
and correct me if I'm wrong, I think I've stumbled on another error by JKR.
I DH, Hermoine tells Ron 9while on the run) that you cant create food, only improve what you already have. But, in the Goblet of Fire, when Harry arrives at the Burrow, and Fred and George take flak for the tofee incident, Mrs. Weasley creates a "creamy sauce" (pg. 55).

Am I missing something? 
Bleeds Nexopia


Age 24, Male
Posts: 20,420
No, no I thought of that instantly too.
But she'll probably say something like it didnt just appear, she was only transfiguring it from some she already had
or that sauce doesnt really consider as food
the more interesting one though is when Mcgonagal makes that plate of replenishing sandwiches and pumpkin juice appear, which okay you can say it was just made from the house elf work for the feast, but do they normally have sandwiches while during a feast? not really 
incognitus
deleted account
JKR rushed DH, and there's SO many flaws.
Yes, it's a damn good book (not my fave from the series, but meh.) but in my honest opinion, if she slowed down a bit, and didn't just crank out a killer book to feed her rabid fans, she would have made a better, less holey book. 
Bleeds Nexopia


Age 24, Male
Posts: 20,420
no, i doubt she would have, she cant remember half the things she writes 
incognitus
deleted account
ah, touche.
to me, DH still seems rushed. 
poison.shade
deleted account
Originally posted by: matt26
No, no I thought of that instantly too.
But she'll probably say something like it didnt just appear, she was only transfiguring it from some she already had
or that sauce doesnt really consider as food
the more interesting one though is when Mcgonagal makes that plate of replenishing sandwiches and pumpkin juice appear, which okay you can say it was just made from the house elf work for the feast, but do they normally have sandwiches while during a feast? not really

maybe the house elves were ordered to make sandwiches. Simple.
Its an obvious answer 
Bleeds Nexopia


Age 22, Male
Posts: 14,903
I think it had a lot to do with how the movies kind of confused everyone, including JK. 
*batmann--
deleted account
i got one for you...
Why does the Polyjuice Potion now mimic voices exactly, when in the Chamber of Secrets, it didn't?
(i may be wrong on this)



when harry takes the polyjuice and turns into runcorn he's described as "yelling in runcorn's deep voice" or something like that
in CoS harry talks in "goyle's low rasp of a voice"
so they don't have to mimic the voices
the potion does that 
incognitus
deleted account
Originally posted by: *batmann--
i got one for you...
Why does the Polyjuice Potion now mimic voices exactly, when in the Chamber of Secrets, it didn't?
(i may be wrong on this)



when harry takes the polyjuice and turns into runcorn he's described as "yelling in runcorn's deep voice" or something like that
in CoS harry talks in "goyle's low rasp of a voice"
so they don't have to mimic the voices
the potion does that

i havent read theCoS for a long ass time, I must be thinking of the movie.
My bad. 
Bleeds Nexopia


Age 22, Male
Posts: 14,903
yes the movie they keep their voices... its warners bros being tight 
Regular


Age 24, Male
Posts: 661
A few of the things you've given explainations for i don't really agree with. if you don't mind i'd like to tell you what i think happened.

How did Harry not die when Voldemort casted the killing curse on him in the Forbidden Forest?
Most people argue he did die. But it was really only the piece of Voldemort in him that died. Since Lily died for Harry she gave him the most protection that anyone could ever have against someone, the power of love (his secret weapon). Harry was vulnerable once he was saved the first time in Godric's Hallow. After that Harry could be killed by Voldemort, but since Voldemort took some of Harry's blood and put it into his own veins in Riddle's graveyard, the protection remained in tact. At this point Harry could not be killed Voldemort. So when Harry was hit by the killing curse the part of Voldemort was attacked and not Harry himself, he was just knocked out by the huge impact of part of his soul leaving.


At first i had no clue what the fuck happened but then it kind've just made sense. If you think about it Voldemort never used the elder wand on harry before he did that first killing curse. I think this is significant in explaining why harry didn't die. Ok so we thought that at first Harry died, but that didn't really happen. I think the part of voldemorts soul within harry died, not harry himself. Harry because the piece of soul was a part of him allowed him to "hitch" a ride to "death". He's just there he didn't actually die, and we know this from what dumbledore says to harry. He says that the piece of Voldemorts soul can't be helped. It's dead that's why, but notice that he doesn't say this to Harry. It's because harry is only dead on visitors terms and has the choice to go back or not. He chooses to go back. The point is that if Harry didn't have a piece of voldemorts soul in him at all then the killing curse wouldn't have affected him in the least. That's because Harry is the master of the elder wand, not Voldemort. Therefore the wand can not be used against Harry to any affect. We find this out almost immediatly when voldemort uses crucio on Harry. Nothing happens and that is to be expected. This is why i think Harry did not truly die. It sounds choppy because i left out quite a few other things to help prove this, but i think that what i've given is proof enough. 
Bleeds Nexopia


Age 24, Male
Posts: 20,420
I think its a mixture actually of the two theories. 
Bleeds Nexopia


Age 22, Male
Posts: 14,903
Originally posted by: Hans-Valkner
A few of the things you've given explainations for i don't really agree with. if you don't mind i'd like to tell you what i think happened.

How did Harry not die when Voldemort casted the killing curse on him in the Forbidden Forest?
Most people argue he did die. But it was really only the piece of Voldemort in him that died. Since Lily died for Harry she gave him the most protection that anyone could ever have against someone, the power of love (his secret weapon). Harry was vulnerable once he was saved the first time in Godric's Hallow. After that Harry could be killed by Voldemort, but since Voldemort took some of Harry's blood and put it into his own veins in Riddle's graveyard, the protection remained in tact. At this point Harry could not be killed Voldemort. So when Harry was hit by the killing curse the part of Voldemort was attacked and not Harry himself, he was just knocked out by the huge impact of part of his soul leaving.


At first i had no clue what the fuck happened but then it kind've just made sense. If you think about it Voldemort never used the elder wand on harry before he did that first killing curse. I think this is significant in explaining why harry didn't die. Ok so we thought that at first Harry died, but that didn't really happen. I think the part of voldemorts soul within harry died, not harry himself. Harry because the piece of soul was a part of him allowed him to "hitch" a ride to "death". He's just there he didn't actually die, and we know this from what dumbledore says to harry. He says that the piece of Voldemorts soul can't be helped. It's dead that's why, but notice that he doesn't say this to Harry. It's because harry is only dead on visitors terms and has the choice to go back or not. He chooses to go back. The point is that if Harry didn't have a piece of voldemorts soul in him at all then the killing curse wouldn't have affected him in the least. That's because Harry is the master of the elder wand, not Voldemort. Therefore the wand can not be used against Harry to any affect. We find this out almost immediatly when voldemort uses crucio on Harry. Nothing happens and that is to be expected. This is why i think Harry did not truly die. It sounds choppy because i left out quite a few other things to help prove this, but i think that what i've given is proof enough.

That was my initial theory as well. However, after JK said that being the master of the hallows didn't have significance to actually controlling whether or not one dies or not only let's one truly understand death. This is what saved Harry. You are a half right in theory however not in explanation.

Once Harry understands death, was the master of death, he knew there were worse things than dying. Harry would have had to have been "killed" in order for Voldemort to have died. Since Harry didn't fear death he allowed himself to be killed which killed the piece of Voldemort's soul. This and the blood were, like Matt said, joint theories. 
Regular


Age 24, Male
Posts: 661
that makes no sense. The fact that someone could be the master of death was just a legend. No one can truly become the master of death nor can one truly understand it. Harry didn't die because of the basic principal of the wand. That principal is that it cannot be used against it's master. The fact that Harry wasn't afraid of death didn't mean he understood it; neither did it make him the master of it. I know that Harry knew he had to die to kill piece of Voldemorts soul but what you've just said has nothing to do with how he survived the curse. You've only proved with that statement that Harry was aware of how to kill Voldemort's piece of soul. 
Bleeds Nexopia


Age 22, Male
Posts: 14,903
Originally posted by: Hans-Valkner
that makes no sense. The fact that someone could be the master of death was just a legend. No one can truly become the master of death nor can one truly understand it. Harry didn't die because of the basic principal of the wand. That principal is that it cannot be used against it's master. The fact that Harry wasn't afraid of death didn't mean he understood it; neither did it make him the master of it. I know that Harry knew he had to die to kill piece of Voldemorts soul but what you've just said has nothing to do with how he survived the curse. You've only proved with that statement that Harry was aware of how to kill Voldemort's piece of soul.

no it was response to your post which had no concrete to it whatsoever and was only a theory. if you go to my faq post you will see why harry didn't die. if you want to be even more observant you can read the book and figure out why i'm right and why your wrong. 
Regular


Age 24, Male
Posts: 661
tell me how the blood saved him then. 
Bleeds Nexopia


Age 22, Male
Posts: 14,903
How did Harry not die when Voldemort casted the killing curse on him in the Forbidden Forest?
Most people argue he did die. But it was really only the piece of Voldemort in him that died. Since Lily died for Harry she gave him the most protection that anyone could ever have against someone, the power of love (his secret weapon). Harry was vulnerable once he was saved the first time in Godric's Hallow. After that Harry could be killed by Voldemort, but since Voldemort took some of Harry's blood and put it into his own veins in Riddle's graveyard, the protection remained in tact. At this point Harry could not be killed Voldemort. So when Harry was hit by the killing curse the part of Voldemort was attacked and not Harry himself, he was just knocked out by the huge impact of part of his soul leaving.
JK said that being the master of the hallows didn't have significance to actually controlling whether or not one dies or not only let's one truly understand death. This is what saved Harry. Once Harry understands death, was the master of death, he knew there were worse things than dying. Harry would have had to have been "killed" in order for Voldemort to have died. Since Harry didn't fear death he allowed himself to be killed which killed the piece of Voldemort's soul. 
Regular


Age 24, Male
Posts: 661
i still don't agree with the blood thing. Harry could not be killed by Voldemort before he took the blood from Harry. Voldemort couldn't even touch Harry, so why afterwards when Voldemort took Harry's blood was he able to then touch Harry. It doesn't make sense that that then would make Harry invincible against Voldemort. Taking Harry's blood nulified the effects of his mothers protection. It makes more sense to think that Harry couldn't die because he was the master of the elder wand and it couldn't be used against him to any negative effect. And Harry didn't understand death neither did he become the master of it. He just knew that if there was to be any chance at defeating Voldemort then he would have to die. 
Bleeds Nexopia


Age 22, Male
Posts: 14,903
First of all, JK said that being the master of the hallows was the master of death. She also determined being the master of death means to understand death.

Voldemort could touch Harry because he had Harry's blood running through his veins. Harry's blood in Voldemort was very parallel to a horcrux. Harry's protection against Voldemort was carried around by another... Harry could have been destroyed by anybody but Voldemort. 
You must be logged in to Reply. Login